Post by Watchman on Oct 24, 2007 13:58:20 GMT -5
The Controlled Struggle - Dialectic - reigned supreme this week concerning the supposed nuclear program of Iran. President Bush even uttered the awful words, "World War III"!
Remember the underpinning principles of the Dialectic process:
1) Major Thesis: "Conflict Brings About Change".
2) Corollary: "Controlled Conflict Brings About A Controlled Change".
3) The "Thesis" party is the one seeking to protect the existing situation
4) The "Antithesis" part is the one seeking a radical change
5) Continual controlled conflict between Thesis and Antithesis -- careful to ensure that neither destroys the other -- will result in a new system which is neither "Thesis" nor "Antithesis", called "Synthesis".
In this Iranian nuclear issue, Russia's President Putin has taken the role of "Thesis", as he seeks to protect the existing situation in Iran, i.e., allowing Iran to continue her program of developing nuclear power plants. (NOTE: Remember that Iran already possesses nuclear weapons - NEWS2120 - since at least early 2002!)
President Bush has assumed the role of "Antithesis", as he seeks a radical change in the status quo, i.e., forcing Iran to give up her supposed race to develop nuclear weapons on her own.
A controlled conflict -- Rumors of Wars -- between Thesis and Antithesis will result in dramatic movement toward the planned World War III, which is designed to overthrow the Old Order so the Masonic Christ can appear to establish the New World Order.
One New World Order author correctly likened this entire controlled conflict as an act, scripted lines read by actors on a global stage. Listen:
"Their script is now written, subject only to last-minute editing and stage-directions. The stage itself, albeit as yet in darkness, is almost ready. Down in the pit, the subterranean orchestra is already tuning up. The last-minute, walk-on parts are even now being filled. Most of the main actors, once suspects, have already taken up their roles. Soon it will be time for them to come on stage, ready for the curtain to rise. The time for action will have come." [Peter Lemesurier, "The Armageddon Script", P. 252, written in 1981, foretelling a global play on a global stage]
Let us hear from President Bush first, since his scripted remarks were the most incendiary imaginable.
NEWS BRIEF: "Bush warns of World War III if Iran goes nuclear", Breitbart News, October 18, 2007
"US President George W. Bush said Wednesday that he had warned world leaders they must prevent Iran from getting nuclear weapons "if you're interested in avoiding World War III. We've got a leader in Iran who has announced that he wants to destroy Israel', Bush said at a White House press conference after Russia cautioned against military action against Tehran's suspect atomic program."
As we have been reporting for five years now (NEWS2120), Iran has possessed nuclear weaponry since at least early, 2002! Therefore, the allegation that Iran is trying to develop nuclear weaponry with her own program, using her own scientists, is ludicrous, especially when you realize that Arab states like Iran and Saudi Arabia have bought Pakistani nuclear warheads "off the shelf", from Pakistani Intelligence. (Read full details in NEWS2120, "Nuclear Armed Iran vs Nuclear Armed America: Whom Should The World Fear?")
This entire campaign against Iran is nothing more, nor less, than sheer propaganda! President Bush is serving as the "Antithesis" party in this controlled struggle.
President Putin of Russia is acting out his role as the "Thesis" party, trying to maintain the status quo for his ally, Iran. This week, Putin sounded very belligerent toward Bush as he was in Iran on his first stop to the Caspian Sea Summit.
NEWS BRIEF: "Russians Will Finish Iranian Nuclear Power Plant – Putin Promises To Help Defend Iran From Attack From The West", Best Syndication News, October 16, 2007
"Russian President Vladimir Putin promised to help the Iranians complete their nuclear reactor at Bushehr and to help protect the country from an attack by the west."
This statement is the strongest Putin has ever delivered on behalf of his ally, Iran. But, it is not the first time Putin has warned the West to not attack Iran. On April 12, 2003, as the Americans were celebrating their seizure of Baghdad, Putin held a news conference in which he warned the Americans he would not tolerate another "Regime Change" in the Middle East. (Read NEWS1802, entitled, "Has Russia Drawn A Line In The Sand Against U.S.?")
And, since that strong statement, President Bush has neither invaded nor overthrown any other nation in the Middle East, especially Iran. How can this be? Since the popular concept is that America is stronger than Russia, how could Russia's Putin force President Bush for the last 4 years to avoid attacking Iran, despite the most highly inflamed public rhetoric imaginable?
The answer is found at the opposite end of the public rhetoric, just as we have said since November, 2001 (NEWS1558, "BREAKING OUT OF THE MENTAL BOX -- LEARNING TO THINK IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION OF PROPAGANDA TO FIND THE TRUTH").
You see, Russia possesses fifth or sixth generation Scalar Electromagnetic Weaponry, while America possesses the much inferior HAARP Electromagnetic Weaponry, plus first generation Scalar.
While neither space nor time allow us to fully develop this line of inquiry fully here, we encourage you to read our articles on this subject and to consider our Bookstore resources, including the two shown above. Our articles are:
NEWS1776 - "THE EMPEROR HAS NO CLOTHES!" -- Part 1 -- Scalar Weaponry
NEWS1776b - "THE EMPEROR HAS NO CLOTHES" -- Part 2 -- Prophetic Line-up!
NEWS2097 -- "Is The Russian-led Invasion Going To Be History's First Scalar War?"
NEWS2155 -- "Israel Seems To Be Outfitting Her Tanks With Scalar Tesla Dome Shields!"
We wish to allow LTC Bearden, author of the book, "Oblivion", above, the final say, on American electromagnetic prowess compared with Russian scalar EM interferometer weaponry.
"We have ground-based radars, endoatmospheric interceptors, exoatmospheric interceptors, airborne sensors, space-based sensors, chemically propelled interceptors, electromagnetic railguns, particle beam weapons, high energy lasers, all tied together by a massive command and control systems ... Massive systems. Electromagnetic marvels. Nuclear-pumped lasers of staggering power. Perhaps even x-ray and gamma ray lasers. Directed energy RF weapons. Stupendous railguns. Sensors everywhere. Giant webs of communications. Banks of computers and control systems."
"And it's totally vulnerable to scalar EM interferometer weapons. Giant scalar EM 'radars' can simply sweep through all that like a scythe through standing hay." ["Fer De Lance", Ibid. , p. 331]
Scalar weaponry can "sweep through" any combination of American weapons like "a scythe through standing hay."
Now you know the REAL reason Bush has never actually attacked Iran, despite his four full years of verbal threats. Is it any wonder that Iran no longer respects our military power? Now you know that an attack on Iran -- whom Russia is defending with her Scalar weaponry -- will probably remain a "Rumors of War" scenario, using the Dialectic Struggle Process which we have described above.
www.cuttingedge.org
Remember the underpinning principles of the Dialectic process:
1) Major Thesis: "Conflict Brings About Change".
2) Corollary: "Controlled Conflict Brings About A Controlled Change".
3) The "Thesis" party is the one seeking to protect the existing situation
4) The "Antithesis" part is the one seeking a radical change
5) Continual controlled conflict between Thesis and Antithesis -- careful to ensure that neither destroys the other -- will result in a new system which is neither "Thesis" nor "Antithesis", called "Synthesis".
In this Iranian nuclear issue, Russia's President Putin has taken the role of "Thesis", as he seeks to protect the existing situation in Iran, i.e., allowing Iran to continue her program of developing nuclear power plants. (NOTE: Remember that Iran already possesses nuclear weapons - NEWS2120 - since at least early 2002!)
President Bush has assumed the role of "Antithesis", as he seeks a radical change in the status quo, i.e., forcing Iran to give up her supposed race to develop nuclear weapons on her own.
A controlled conflict -- Rumors of Wars -- between Thesis and Antithesis will result in dramatic movement toward the planned World War III, which is designed to overthrow the Old Order so the Masonic Christ can appear to establish the New World Order.
One New World Order author correctly likened this entire controlled conflict as an act, scripted lines read by actors on a global stage. Listen:
"Their script is now written, subject only to last-minute editing and stage-directions. The stage itself, albeit as yet in darkness, is almost ready. Down in the pit, the subterranean orchestra is already tuning up. The last-minute, walk-on parts are even now being filled. Most of the main actors, once suspects, have already taken up their roles. Soon it will be time for them to come on stage, ready for the curtain to rise. The time for action will have come." [Peter Lemesurier, "The Armageddon Script", P. 252, written in 1981, foretelling a global play on a global stage]
Let us hear from President Bush first, since his scripted remarks were the most incendiary imaginable.
NEWS BRIEF: "Bush warns of World War III if Iran goes nuclear", Breitbart News, October 18, 2007
"US President George W. Bush said Wednesday that he had warned world leaders they must prevent Iran from getting nuclear weapons "if you're interested in avoiding World War III. We've got a leader in Iran who has announced that he wants to destroy Israel', Bush said at a White House press conference after Russia cautioned against military action against Tehran's suspect atomic program."
As we have been reporting for five years now (NEWS2120), Iran has possessed nuclear weaponry since at least early, 2002! Therefore, the allegation that Iran is trying to develop nuclear weaponry with her own program, using her own scientists, is ludicrous, especially when you realize that Arab states like Iran and Saudi Arabia have bought Pakistani nuclear warheads "off the shelf", from Pakistani Intelligence. (Read full details in NEWS2120, "Nuclear Armed Iran vs Nuclear Armed America: Whom Should The World Fear?")
This entire campaign against Iran is nothing more, nor less, than sheer propaganda! President Bush is serving as the "Antithesis" party in this controlled struggle.
President Putin of Russia is acting out his role as the "Thesis" party, trying to maintain the status quo for his ally, Iran. This week, Putin sounded very belligerent toward Bush as he was in Iran on his first stop to the Caspian Sea Summit.
NEWS BRIEF: "Russians Will Finish Iranian Nuclear Power Plant – Putin Promises To Help Defend Iran From Attack From The West", Best Syndication News, October 16, 2007
"Russian President Vladimir Putin promised to help the Iranians complete their nuclear reactor at Bushehr and to help protect the country from an attack by the west."
This statement is the strongest Putin has ever delivered on behalf of his ally, Iran. But, it is not the first time Putin has warned the West to not attack Iran. On April 12, 2003, as the Americans were celebrating their seizure of Baghdad, Putin held a news conference in which he warned the Americans he would not tolerate another "Regime Change" in the Middle East. (Read NEWS1802, entitled, "Has Russia Drawn A Line In The Sand Against U.S.?")
And, since that strong statement, President Bush has neither invaded nor overthrown any other nation in the Middle East, especially Iran. How can this be? Since the popular concept is that America is stronger than Russia, how could Russia's Putin force President Bush for the last 4 years to avoid attacking Iran, despite the most highly inflamed public rhetoric imaginable?
The answer is found at the opposite end of the public rhetoric, just as we have said since November, 2001 (NEWS1558, "BREAKING OUT OF THE MENTAL BOX -- LEARNING TO THINK IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION OF PROPAGANDA TO FIND THE TRUTH").
You see, Russia possesses fifth or sixth generation Scalar Electromagnetic Weaponry, while America possesses the much inferior HAARP Electromagnetic Weaponry, plus first generation Scalar.
While neither space nor time allow us to fully develop this line of inquiry fully here, we encourage you to read our articles on this subject and to consider our Bookstore resources, including the two shown above. Our articles are:
NEWS1776 - "THE EMPEROR HAS NO CLOTHES!" -- Part 1 -- Scalar Weaponry
NEWS1776b - "THE EMPEROR HAS NO CLOTHES" -- Part 2 -- Prophetic Line-up!
NEWS2097 -- "Is The Russian-led Invasion Going To Be History's First Scalar War?"
NEWS2155 -- "Israel Seems To Be Outfitting Her Tanks With Scalar Tesla Dome Shields!"
We wish to allow LTC Bearden, author of the book, "Oblivion", above, the final say, on American electromagnetic prowess compared with Russian scalar EM interferometer weaponry.
"We have ground-based radars, endoatmospheric interceptors, exoatmospheric interceptors, airborne sensors, space-based sensors, chemically propelled interceptors, electromagnetic railguns, particle beam weapons, high energy lasers, all tied together by a massive command and control systems ... Massive systems. Electromagnetic marvels. Nuclear-pumped lasers of staggering power. Perhaps even x-ray and gamma ray lasers. Directed energy RF weapons. Stupendous railguns. Sensors everywhere. Giant webs of communications. Banks of computers and control systems."
"And it's totally vulnerable to scalar EM interferometer weapons. Giant scalar EM 'radars' can simply sweep through all that like a scythe through standing hay." ["Fer De Lance", Ibid. , p. 331]
Scalar weaponry can "sweep through" any combination of American weapons like "a scythe through standing hay."
Now you know the REAL reason Bush has never actually attacked Iran, despite his four full years of verbal threats. Is it any wonder that Iran no longer respects our military power? Now you know that an attack on Iran -- whom Russia is defending with her Scalar weaponry -- will probably remain a "Rumors of War" scenario, using the Dialectic Struggle Process which we have described above.
www.cuttingedge.org