www.cuttingedge.orgSuddenly, Prince Harry is not going to serve outside Basra, Iraq, as planned. Or, is he still going, under the cover of an untruthful media cover story?
For several months now, the British military command insisted that Prince Harry was going to serve with his elite surveillance unit in Iraq. As a matter of fact, Harry was to serve in the area south and east of Basra, Iraq.
This plan really piqued our interest because Illuminist author, H.G. Wells, stated in 1933 that World War III, which is designed to stage the Masonic Christ on the world scene, would begin because of some incident that would occur in Basra. Let us once again review that quote; you will be amazed.
".. the plan for the 'Modern World-State' would succeed in its third attempt (Third World War) and would come out of something that would occur in Basra, Iraq." ["The Globalists: The Power Elite Exposed", by Dr. Dennis Cuddy, p. 50., as he quotes Wells' 1933 book, "The Shape of Things To Come"]
World War I began because of the murder of a European royal. If Prince Harry were to be captured and brutally tortured before being murdered, that could begin World War III.
Right on cue, leadership of the Iraqi insurgency declared that they would welcome 22-year-old Prince Harry to the battlefield, and will seek to capture him. The stage seemed to be set for this part of the Illuminati Plan to be fulfilled.
Until Thursday of last week, that is.
NEWS BRIEF: "'Specific Threats' Halt Harry Iraq Tour", Sky News, Thursday May 17, 2007
"Prince Harry will not deploy with his regiment to Iraq following 'specific threats' to target him by insurgents fighting British and US forces. The head of the Army, General Sir Richard Dannatt, said his presence in Iraq would expose the 22-year-old Prince as well as the troops serving with him to 'a degree of risk that I now deem unacceptable'. In a statement, Clarence House admitted that the Prince was "very disappointed" that he would not be going with his squadron in the Household Cavalry.
"Gen Dannatt said that he had finally reached the decision that the risks were too great after visiting Iraq himself at the end of last week. There have been a number of specific threats - some reported and some not reported - which relate directly to Prince Harry as an individual. 'These threats expose not only him but those around him to a degree of risk that I now deem unacceptable'."
A leading British journalist had an interesting, and telling, take on this matter.
"Sky News Foreign Editor Tim Marshall said it was because 'he is a magnet for jihadists. Sending him in not only endangers those around him - the effect of being kidnapped would be a blow to the entire UK."
Indeed, his capture and brutal murder would be a tremendous blow to Great Britain, so much a blow that the type of retaliation which would spark a world war might be considered. If Prince Harry were captured, brutally tortured, and graphically murdered, Great Britain might retaliate by invading Iran across the Iraq border which is very close to Basra.
If this were to occur, world powers like Russia and China could be sucked quickly into the fray, precipitating World War III.
But, on the surface of it all, this development means that the incident in Basra which could trigger this planned world war has been averted. At the very least, General Dannatt's decision seems to remove Prince Harry from being a part of this "incident".
However, I was skeptical of this announcement from General Sir Richard Dannatt, because of my experience in U.S. Army Intelligence from 1968-1972, at a Pentagon-level facility in Okinawa. On numerous occasions, elite military operations were protected by a false story leaked to the media; the "news" given out by an official organ of the military would be totally, completely false. If the enemy tried to ascertain where the operation was taking place by reading the media story, they would be looking in the wrong place, at the wrong time!
Therefore, I wondered if this announcement was intended to get people to believe that Prince Harry was not going to the Basra area, when the reality was that he was secretly being sent after all. If the Iraqi Insurgency believed the news reports, they would not even look for Harry.
If this deception could be pulled off, Prince Harry could serve in Iraq with the same kind of anonymity with which the average British soldier serves. The media story would have served his purpose.
People who voluntarily research on behalf of Cutting Edge combed current news stories to see if anyone was whispering this possibility, i.e., that Harry was really going to Iraq after all, but under the cover of this story which says that he is not going.
We discovered these quotes.
NEWS BRIEF: "Prince Harry won’t go to Iraq, and Britain is divided over the decision", Jennifer Quinn, Associated Press, reprinted by Canada.com, May 17, 2007
"One army officer, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he is not authorized to speak to the media, said many in the military took the announcement that Harry would not go to Iraq with 'a pinch of salt. Many of us think he’s probably going to arrive anyway, outside of the media attention',” said the officer, who has served two tours in Iraq."
So, there you have it, many British officers believe that Prince Harry will serve in Iraq after all, "outside of the media attention". Exactly what I surmised.
NEWS BRIEF: "Army mulls Prince Harry's role", Gulf News, May 18, 2007
"Military sources said they would find a way for him to enter and leave the conflict area without the public finding out until he was safely home."
Once again, someone else is expressing the same doubt with this official pronouncement which we have had. This is so typical of the establishment military and government!
However, there is one more obstacle we have to overcome before we can give this possibility a serious look. If Prince Harry is going to Iraq after all, under the cover of this news story, then someone has to do something to keep the media from asking where the party-hardy Prince Harry is on the London nightclub circuit. That kind of media questioning could quickly lead to this lie being unraveled. If the Prince were really in Great Britain, rather than with his unit outside Basra, Iraq, then he would be seen frequenting his favorite nightclub spots. His absence from these clubs would raise all sorts of alarms.
This next news story takes care of this problem.
NEWS BRIEF: "Prince Harry Banned From Nightclubs While His Unit Is Serving In Iraq: Boozy nights off limits for Harry", by DUNCAN LARCOMBE, Royal Correspondent, The Sun, May 18, 2007
"DISTRAUGHT Prince Harry was last night reeling from a SECOND devastating blow in 24 hours — a ban on visiting nightclubs. The party-loving Army officer — still shattered after being told he will not be joining his men in Iraq — has been ordered to 'lie low' while his unit is away. He was given a pep talk by Royal and military advisers who fear a terrible backlash if the Prince is pictured boozing in London while soldiers from his Blues and Royals squadron are under fire. Harry has attracted recent bad publicity with antics inside and outside his favourite London clubs like Boujis, Mahiki, Pangaea and Purple. And a Royal source said yesterday:
" 'It has been made clear that these drunken nights out are strictly off limits. Harry totally accepts how bad it would look for him to be out enjoying himself while others risk their lives'."
So, we believe that Prince Harry is still going to Basra, Iraq, and that he is probably already on the ground. With strong war signals coming out of Israel, the 1933 plan of the Illuminati to create an incident in Basra, Iraq, may still be on schedule.
We have one more understanding to make clear.
When H.G. Wells revealed in his 1933 book that World War III was planned to begin because of an incident which would occur in Basra, Iraq, he revealed an inner part of the plan which he knew only because he was a member of the Illuminati.
In other words, this plan to create an incident in Basra so serious that it could start a world war is an Illuminati Plan. If the death of Prince Harry is planned to be that incident, Harry will have been set up, and betrayed by leaders of the Illuminati.
Former Satanists have told me that virtually the entire leadership of Great Britain is Illuminati and that Prince Charles is THE key leader of the worldwide group. Tim Cohen, author of the insightful book, "Antichrist And A Cup of Tea", provides wonderfully thorough documentation that the House of Windsor fulfills all the Biblical requirements of Antichrist. Cohen contends that THE Antichrist is likely to be either Prince Charles or Prince William.
Therefore, if 22-year-old Prince Harry is the sacrificial lamb which will start World War III, he will be betrayed by the very leaders who now are expressing the greatest concern for his safety! Such inner complicity in the murders of government officials in the past is not unusual. Israeli author, Barry Chamish, reveals in his book, "Who Killed Yitchak Rabin" that, just seconds before the gunman ran out from the crowd to shoot at Prime Minister Rabin, his bodyguards inexplicably stopped and then backed up, thus providing a few precious seconds for Rabin to be exposed to the gunman's fire. Just before shots rang out on the Grassy Knoll in Dallas, Texas, killing President John F. Kennedy, his driver inexplicably came nearly to a halt, thus providing a few seconds for the shooters.
If Prince Harry is captured, British Illuminati government leaders will be complicit.